Zelensky Insists on Military Guarantees in U.S.-Ukraine Minerals Deal

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has made it clear that any deal involving U.S. access to Ukraine’s mineral resources must include military guarantees to ensure the nation’s security. This comes in response to a proposal from the United States that seeks substantial rights to Ukraine’s mineral wealth, including critical elements such as titanium and lithium, as compensation for military aid provided during Ukraine’s conflict with Russia.

U.S. Proposal and Ukrainian Response

The United States, particularly under the Trump administration, has proposed an arrangement in which Ukraine would grant significant access to its mineral reserves in exchange for past military support. Reports suggest that the U.S. has sought control over up to $500 billion worth of these resources—far surpassing the estimated $100 billion in military and financial aid that Ukraine has received.

President Zelensky has strongly rejected this proposal, emphasizing that the assistance provided by the U.S. was intended as a grant to support Ukraine’s defense rather than a loan requiring repayment. “A grant is not a debt,” Zelensky stated, reaffirming Ukraine’s position that it cannot be compelled to compensate for aid that was given in the spirit of alliance and partnership.

Demand for Military Guarantees

Zelensky’s primary condition for any economic deal involving Ukraine’s mineral wealth is the inclusion of written military guarantees from the U.S. He fears that without such guarantees, Ukraine may remain vulnerable to further Russian aggression, especially if future U.S. administrations alter their stance on supporting Kyiv. Given the ongoing war and the shifting political landscape, Ukraine seeks assurances that it will not be left defenseless should hostilities resume or escalate.

As part of this demand, Zelensky is calling for formalized agreements that outline clear security commitments from the U.S. These could take the form of long-term military aid packages, joint defense pacts, or other legally binding mechanisms designed to deter Russian advances.

International Reactions and Diplomatic Efforts

Zelensky’s stance has garnered attention from European leaders, with figures such as French President Emmanuel Macron and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer reportedly planning to discuss the matter with former U.S. President Donald Trump. Their concern is that an unfair minerals deal could undermine Ukraine’s sovereignty and potentially weaken transatlantic alliances.

In addition, European nations are wary of any agreement that could lead to Ukraine becoming overly dependent on external powers for its economic and security needs. They are pushing for a balanced approach that safeguards Ukraine’s resources while ensuring its long-term stability.

Ukraine’s Commitment to Sovereignty

President Zelensky remains committed to preserving Ukraine’s sovereignty, making it clear that he would rather step down from office than accept a deal that jeopardizes the country’s future. He has expressed openness to making personal sacrifices, including resigning if it would contribute to achieving peace or facilitate Ukraine’s membership in NATO.

At the same time, Ukraine is conducting a thorough assessment of its mineral wealth to ensure that any future agreements are based on transparent and fair negotiations. This review includes examining past acquisitions and ownership records to prevent any exploitation of Ukraine’s natural resources by foreign entities.